Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Friday, October 29, 2004
Al QaQaa Weapons Update
As more information comes to light, mabye it's time to re-visit the entire Al QaQaa issue. The Pentagon just had a press conference with Major Austin Pearson, describing his ordnance-removal activities. Though the picture is still unclear, more light is shed hour by hour.
Here's what the press conference revealed & reiterated.
- The explosives in question constituted 1/1000th of what was identified and being destroyed in Iraq.
- Contrary to what the Times implies, military commanders were tracking these sites and issuing orders to have the material destroyed. Maj. Pearson's April 13 mission was perhaps the first of any number of such missions.
- There's no evidence that the Times made an effort to track down commanders like Major Pearson, or otherwise determine if the explosives were properly disposed.
- The described mission's purpose was to protect the troops at the site. Hence, the site was being occupied. (If there are no enemy forces in the area, which there weren't at the time, one wouldn't necessarily use the word "guard," as in "we guarded it from nobody.")
- Satellite photos show Saddam's activity before the arrival of US forces, with trucks on the site. This could explain what Pearson described as "exposed" munitions.
- No sign of IAEA seals on this mission.
- It's not clear if this first mission was to even break open locked bunkers. Other bunkers had dirt piled against the door to impede access.
Comments:
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
I watched the press conference.
What shocked me was Major Peterson stating that he had personally supervised the destruction of 7000 tons of munitions. This is 20 times the amount that is supposedly missing.
The mainstream media never made a comment on this, they were obsessing on the "missing" items.
What shocked me was Major Peterson stating that he had personally supervised the destruction of 7000 tons of munitions. This is 20 times the amount that is supposedly missing.
The mainstream media never made a comment on this, they were obsessing on the "missing" items.
What about Mr Bin Ladens latest?
translated from arabic:
" Allah ho Akbar!!! what about me then?? I start a fight with you and you all run in the WRONG DIRECTON and get your kids killed in IRAQ instead!!!what sort of idiots idea was that then??"
translated from arabic:
" Allah ho Akbar!!! what about me then?? I start a fight with you and you all run in the WRONG DIRECTON and get your kids killed in IRAQ instead!!!what sort of idiots idea was that then??"
Post a Comment
<< Home