Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Monday, July 07, 2008
Saddam's Yellowcake
How about that? Saddam had 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium after all.
Comments:
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
As the article says, "Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said."
So apparently everyone knew about this yellowcake. It was there in 1991. If it has been seen as any kind of threat what-so-ever wouldn't Bush the Elder have taken the initiative to remove it?
The fact that you raving Bush apologists are trying to twist this very old well-known story into some kind of rationale for our grand three trillion dollar war would be laughable if it were not so pathetic.
So apparently everyone knew about this yellowcake. It was there in 1991. If it has been seen as any kind of threat what-so-ever wouldn't Bush the Elder have taken the initiative to remove it?
The fact that you raving Bush apologists are trying to twist this very old well-known story into some kind of rationale for our grand three trillion dollar war would be laughable if it were not so pathetic.
Hi! Thanks for taking time to comment. Thanks for looking closer than I did, too. I glossed over the key parts you mentioned, and my original comment is off in light of that. Thanks for pointing that out.
The news is that it's finally safe, as opposed to still being in Saddam's Iraq. (Recall that David Kay said, "... what we learned during the inspection made [Saddam's] Iraq a more dangerous place potentially, than in fact we thought it was even before the war.")
If it has been seen as any kind of threat what-so-ever wouldn't Bush the Elder have taken the initiative to remove it?
No. Bush the Elder didn't enforce the conditions of his own cease fire (which Saddam didn't meet). He knew Saddam had (and used) WMD on his own people, but took no real initiative on that either. (That was pre-9/11, though, before we had to re-calculate Iraq's WMD threat.)
The fact that you raving Bush apologists are trying to twist this very old well-known story...
Hey, let's be fair: I'm a Congress apologist and Bill Clinton apologist, too, if that's how you want to look at it. And if you originally supported the war, I'm an apologist for you, too.
...our grand three trillion dollar war...
Speaking of twisting, I doubt that the financial cost was your original primary reason for opposing the war. (Or maybe you put something on record at the time that proves me wrong.) Eh?
The news is that it's finally safe, as opposed to still being in Saddam's Iraq. (Recall that David Kay said, "... what we learned during the inspection made [Saddam's] Iraq a more dangerous place potentially, than in fact we thought it was even before the war.")
If it has been seen as any kind of threat what-so-ever wouldn't Bush the Elder have taken the initiative to remove it?
No. Bush the Elder didn't enforce the conditions of his own cease fire (which Saddam didn't meet). He knew Saddam had (and used) WMD on his own people, but took no real initiative on that either. (That was pre-9/11, though, before we had to re-calculate Iraq's WMD threat.)
The fact that you raving Bush apologists are trying to twist this very old well-known story...
Hey, let's be fair: I'm a Congress apologist and Bill Clinton apologist, too, if that's how you want to look at it. And if you originally supported the war, I'm an apologist for you, too.
...our grand three trillion dollar war...
Speaking of twisting, I doubt that the financial cost was your original primary reason for opposing the war. (Or maybe you put something on record at the time that proves me wrong.) Eh?
Post a Comment
<< Home