Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Monday, June 25, 2007
Speech Suppression
I was on campus at Depaul the other day, and saw posters proclaiming very noble campus ideals. The first said hate-speech has no place there. The second said they embraced diversity.
Wonderful. Except that those in charge can dispose of anything they really disagree with by casting it as hate speech.
George Will says it better than I could:
And it was predictable that speech suppression would become an instrument of cultural combat, used to settle ideological scores and advance political agendas by silencing adversaries.
Here's the "hate speech" he cites:
Marriage is the foundation of the natural family and sustains family values.
With every bit of authority comes the ability--and willingness--to abuse it. Speech codes included.
Via Instapundit
Saturday, June 23, 2007
Todd Agnew's My Jesus
I love Todd Agnew's music. I love his voice.
I love his lyrics...mostly.
In his song, My Jesus, I appreciate his challenging my image of Jesus.
But I kind of have a problem with this:
Cause my Jesus would never be accepted in my church
The blood and dirt on His feet might stain the carpet
I'd like to ask his church's leaders if they'd agree with that.
Or maybe he's talking about "my church" as in, you know, my church, not his church. But that means he's asserting things about a church he doesn't know. Seems pretty unfair.
A lot of churches need reproof for a lot of things, mine included. But reproof is specific and constructive, not assertions like this. This seems more like a cheap-shot than a reproof.
I want--need--to have my conscience pricked. But I don't think church-bashing is the way to do it.
Hopefully, everybody but me just goes away thinking, "Jesus matters more than my church's (or my) carpet." (He does matter more.)
Friday, June 22, 2007
Chicago Sight: Marina City
The distinctive round towers of the Marina City Parking Garage.
The first dozen or so levels are parking, with (I think) condos above.
They were just featured in some TV ad. A car races through one then crashes out and falls into the river.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Ephesians 4:14-15
Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming. Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ.
These verses imply:
- "Waves" and "winds" of false teaching, and "deceitful scheming" exist.
- We should expect to encounter them.
- We should expect to see others "tossed back and forth" by them.
- An all-powerful God allows them.
- God calls us to counter these things by "speaking the truth in love."