Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
An Ugly Beating
The Republicans took an ugly beating yesterday in the elections.
I've been too busy to blog much, but I suppose I should reflect a little.
I'm not happy about it. Plenty of reasons for concern. Ironically, most of the Democrats elected are more moderate than their Congressional leaders.
But not the end of the Republic. No plans to move to France or Canada. I won't accuse Democrats of brain-washing, being Nazis, etc. (Don't forget that I do think that our culture has been trying to brain-wash us in general for decades--mostly towards hedonism.)
Everybody's claiming to speak for the electorate. I won't presume to (at least too carelessly), and might scrutinize some such claims (when I have the time).
How about a list of Pros and Cons?
Pros:
- Shakes up the Republican leadership. Hopefully makes them think about their core values.
- We'll get a better view of Nancy Pelosi's nuttiness.
- We may get a better view of Harry Reid's nuttiness (and corruption).
- Will the MSM switch into softball mode? We'll see what double-standards emerge.
- The noise that will follow on impeaching Bush should provide fertile ground for scrutiny. (I don't think he'll get impeached.)
- Bush starts to think harder about what to veto.
- Lots more claims for you and I to evaluate.
- Lots more opportunities for you and I to think about what we value.
Cons:
- Congress may betray the 50 million Bush liberated.
- Nancy Pelosi seems pretty incompetent.
- Harry Reid seems pretty corrupt and incompetent.
- Charlie Rangel is a nutter.
- Energizes the fringe nutty left, even though their poster-child Ned Lamont went down in flames.
- The fringe impeachment lobby will gain some momentum, regardless of the fraudulence of its claims. Like the "Bush lied" fraud, it takes on a life of its own.
That's all I have time for now. Cheers.
Comments:
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
Post a Comment
<< Home