Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
'Deep Vote' speaks on voter fraud
Experience has taught Deep Vote that it is transiency which provides Democrat political operatives with the most golden of opportunities to steal votes. In depressed urban areas an inordinate number of residents move in and out every year, with some taking up residence for only a brief time.
Comments:
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
It's so ironic that so much of the voter fraud is convicted by the democratic side...and so many layers to it! I can't tell you how many times I've heard someone say Bush stole the election. What a bunch of unfounded crap.
The 2000 election was verifiably stolen. Read Greg Palast's "The Best Democracy Money can Buy" and that corruption is what makes this post so ironic.
Verifiably stolen seems to be a relative term...based on your political agenda. It would be easier to believe the 2000 election was stolen if the democrats (as a whole) exhibited integrity in the last election. But conviction after conviction would state otherwise. Why would anybody believe they were blameless 2000 and deserved to win?
I'm no defender of the Dems. I'm a progressive that tends to vote Green. The Dems are purt' near as corrupt as the Republicans. Or at least I would have said so before this current crew.
Now, I'd say that the Dems are corrupt and spineless, but the Republicans are grandly, flamingly corrupt.
Now, I'd say that the Dems are corrupt and spineless, but the Republicans are grandly, flamingly corrupt.
I'm sure Greg "not-one-shred-of-evidence" Palast presents us a shocking global conspiracy, while hitting every leftist note with perfect pitch. Few books bear Michael (too-far-left-for-Mother-Jones) Moore's endorsement so proudly.
But I think John Fund would be a more serious read.
Even paleo-liberal Paul Krugman has been back-peddaling on his stolen election claims (though not enough).
Studies and criminal convictions break heavily Democratic, consistent with Deep Vote's experience.
But I think John Fund would be a more serious read.
Even paleo-liberal Paul Krugman has been back-peddaling on his stolen election claims (though not enough).
Studies and criminal convictions break heavily Democratic, consistent with Deep Vote's experience.
Post a Comment
<< Home