Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
Informs my values.
Posts On This Page:
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Monday, April 18, 2005
Welcome back, Socialist Wankers. (Haven't heard from you in a while, though I've been a bit out of it myself.)
Before I go further, here are my views on Socialism:
I think Socialism is great for certain situations: on small scales, and when participation is voluntary. I think about monastaries and convents, Israeli kibbutzim, and even open-source software projects. They work well, and I commend them for it.
But on the national scale, Socialism is the worst blight ever perpetrated on this wretched planet (particularly its twin: Communism). I don't say that to justify other horrific ideologies. But Socialism is the worst. By any objective measure (like human life or poverty), Socialism has done more to murder and impoverish than anything else, by a wide margin.
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
PS I've enjoyed watching you and Brad go at it a couple times. Heh. He's a good debator, isn't he?
I am brewing a response to the Scrutinator's comments on socialism for socialistwanker
although I am afraid that I am neither a true socialist or a true revolutionary in a political sense.
It must also be said that I invited the scrutinator to be our guest republican (check our web page) but he declined saying that he had to look after his wife and chop up his dog or something.
The vacancy is still open, but would ideally be suited to someone a bit more vicious and condescending than mr. scrutinator... any takers?
It is a joke at the expense of a rather dogmatic group of british socialists. Not that I am against socialism...
For the record I think you lot are confusing socialism with stalinist communism (which wasn't what I'd call communism either...)
A more concise version of our views is here
-not that this explains anything either!
I'm afraid that although I know the broad spectrum of politics that I hate, ie conservatism/republicanism, the more I film the less of an established viewpoint I actually take.
Politically I am a jester. All "sides" seem to dislike me. I have deliberately put myself in this position and I don't know why.
I have finnaly read the whole article that the scrutinator is refering to.
I am very happy that I am learning about the history of socialism from a republican.
here is what a fellow disillusioned lefty said about me. There is a recording of the chat we had at the bottom.
Maybe you can work out my politics from that cos I can't.
No it hasn't, that's utter bollocks. Pre-1945 Germany and Japan weren't socialist. Looking at history, a combination of rigid dogmas and the scientific-military complex produced the despots and police states of both the left and right.
Personally, as a situationist, I believe in putting the revolution at the disposal of poetry...
"The vacancy is still open, but would ideally be suited to someone a bit more vicious and condescending than mr. scrutinator... any takers?"
I'm crestfallen. You got my hopes up with by calling me "an evil, evil person," but now I don't measure up! ;-(
Seriously, though, I appreciate the dialog. And I do take heart in your calling yourself a "disillusioned lefty," though I won't presume to guess where you'll finally land, politically (if you ever do). I completely missed the worker / wanker play. Someimes ya just gotta spell it out for me, and I appreciate it.
You're right that Germany and Japan weren't socialist, but horrifically murderous just the same. And rigid dogma does promote totalitarianism.
But the gruesome statistics are what they are, and Communism is clearly the bloodiest.
dave bones says I'm "confusing socialism with stalinist communism (which wasn't what I'd call communism either...)"
But some say that the socialist utopian dream itself carries the seeds of Stalinism. That best explains why every socialist experiment has gone heinously awry.
(The "scientific-military complex" I'd debate, but maybe not here and now. Don't forget they gave us the personal computer and the Internet--two powerful weapons for freedom.)
I have friends who are part of it. (sorry cant find anything to hyperlink) These are real people trying to run society with the lessons learned by the open source projects you are quoting.
Are your friends the ones making sure people like me are the "first up against the wall?"
To answer your points: Yes. I have definately heard from people who would put those who oppose the revolution against the wall. Not my idea of a solution, but didn't your government back Pinochet who did the same thing?
In the US backed coo that tried to depose him, Chavez chose not to go down this route. From what I have heard, those involved are under house arrest.
I understand that from your original post you and those who supply the news you read would like the failure of socialism to be the truth, and I and my ilk would like the success to be the truth, but neither of us are in Venezuela are we?
I dragged the deekster over here to defend socialism in more words than I am able, be assured that I will try and get those involved in the Venezuelan experiment to come over here to speak for themselves.
Good to meet you mate, I hope this will be an experiment in which we will all end up happier!
God bless! (if there is one!)
I won't defend Pinochet, but this article (by a really, really disillusioned leftist) puts things in perspective: "Fidel, Pinochet & Me". I think what he says might actually resonate with you. And the parallels to Venezuela are remarkable.
And that brings me around to what you didn't address: If it's true that Chavez is in league with Cuba, doesn't that mean this experiment is going the very Stalinist route you refuse to defend? How do we determine, objectively, whether Cuba is involved?
I bumped into my venezeula solidarity friend at a cannabis march today funny enough. He got my email and said he'd get back shortly.
The website he is involved with is hands off venezuela
personally I dont trust any "ego-leadership". I think it is yesterdays news for my species, hence the "attack your own side" socialistwankerleanings!. When humans evolve beyond this to take communal responsibility we will all make progress.
I have heard various reports from cuba. A few friends went and never bothered to come back, they are having a great life over there.
As far as my friends, they are involving themselves with an emerging society of people who are taking responsibility for themselves and each other, from what I have heard.
Going back to your original posting I am drawn to what the guy says about the derogatory effect of socialism on the populace:
Hayek thought he had observed an important change in the character of the British people, as a result both of their collectivist aspirations and of such collectivist measures as had already been legislated. He noted, for example, a shift in the locus of people’s moral concern. Increasingly, it was the state of society or the world as a whole that engaged their moral passion, not their own conduct. “It is, however, more than doubtful whether a fifty years’ approach towards collectivism has raised our moral standards, or whether the change has not rather been in the opposite direction,” he wrote.
“Though we are in the habit of priding ourselves on our more sensitive social conscience, it is by no means clear that this is justified by the practice of our individual conduct.”
I certainly notice just the opposite in the stuff I have seen. Are the people who make this media going to have their pulitzer prize withdrawn for lying? Don't know mate. As I said at the begining,
see you in bogata!
carracas is venezuela. Ah well lets go to columbia for a good sniff instead. nothing like coke to make you forget your politics!
and a nation which doesn't think of the country as THEIRS but for sale to the highest bidder.
"Hands off Venezuela." That's rich. Not totalitarian Cuba's hands, of course.
Not being a Brit, I can't defend the author's observations. I hope he's wrong, as that would reflect best on the British people. But Hayek predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union while your forebears were praising its accomplishments: that alone ought to give him a Pulitzer.
Are you sure your Cuban visitors aren't in prison or dead? (Not that good apparatchiki would have anything to fear.) Maybe they're strapping together anything that floats to try to get to the US, like tens of thousands of Cubans have done. Think about that: what would it take for you to make a raft out of anything you could get your hands on, launch across the english channel (but five times wider and shark infested), and start a new life with just the clothes you're wearing?
as far as I know my friends are mountain biking, diving and spending a lot of time camping in the jungle.
PS LOVE the birthday party.
I dont think my politics have moved far at all. I'm just much more polite about them than I used to be!
Both films are great.
I wear a crucifix around my neck and by God more people have been killed burned tortured raped murdered in the shadow of that sign than that of any other throughout the ages!
With you, I decry each of the many, many wrongs done in the name of Christianity. But they've been dwarfed by the evils done by Communist (Socialist) states.
Post a Comment