Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Friday, October 15, 2004
Scrutinizing Nightline's Kerry Silver Star Story
ABC News' Nightline segment (Oct 14, 2004) attempts to debunk the Swiftboat Veterans account of Kerry's silver star. To do so, they go to the same spot the battle was fought and interview villagers. And the villagers verify Kerry's version.
This story seems like junk journalism. Here's why.
First, and most fundamentally, as John O'Neill alluded to, Vietnam is run by a dictatorial communist party: "Freedom House considers Vietnam to be a not free [sic] country." This casts very serious doubt on all villagers' testimony. ABC ignores this fact. In fact, they seem to cast the government as benign: "it did not want to somehow influence the U.S. presidential election." If communist, dictatorial North Korea endorses Kerry, perhaps Vietnam does as well.
But just for the sake of argument, lets say the people are free to speak. And lets say they found the right village. The story still doesn't answer these questions:
- How do we know they're not confusing different battles? As ABC reports, "the area was a hotbed of guerrilla activity" and Viet Cong "reinforcements had been dispatched from provincial headquarters specifically to target the Swift boats." So it's likely that wasn't the only battle there. ABC should have found an after-action report from the same location or area, but for a different battle on a different date (even year), and see how well they distinguished the two. (Assuming they weren't leading their witnesses.)
- Was each witness interviewed independently and specifically? Each should have been asked to describe what specifically transpired, with diagrams, names of comrades, etc. (How many Swift boats were involved? How did they get away? How long did they stay away? Where was this "rest and supply area"?) How well would those various accounts corroborate? We're vaguely led to believe this happened. ABC should release all such diagrams and word-for-word testimony (but I doubt any exists).
- The stories they do tell don't seem to corroborate very well. That doesn't mean it couldn't have happened, but the further the stories diverge, the more doubt is cast.
- Why do the various Kerry biographies disagree? Nightline neither showed those quotes, nor do they interview the authors of those books.
Comments:
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
Post a Comment
<< Home