Who am I?
Christian. Skeptic. Ponderer. Sold on Western Civilization. Background in engineering and software. Rational, but not rationalist.
I'm a Hugh-inspired, long-tail blogger.
I Value
Informs my values.
News
Blog Search
Posts On This Page:
Archives
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- February 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- October 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- February 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- February 2013
Look closer. Think harder. Choose the sound argument over the clever one.
Friday, October 22, 2004
Scrutinizing ACLU's Patriot Act Ad
Here's the ad's text (punctuation my own, since narration changes with each phrase):
So the government can search your house? My house...our house...without notifying us. Treating us all like suspects. It's part of the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act. They want to make the whole thing permanent, with no debate, no review. Questioning parts of the Patriot Act isn't liberal or conservative, left or right. It's American. American. We can change the Patriot Act so we can be safe, safe and free, free. Safe and free.
www.aclu.org/patriotact ("Because freedom can't protect itself." Paid for by the ACLU Foundation.)
But here's what the Constitution's Fourth Amendment says:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
So the government has always had the power to search your house without notifying you. And the ACLU's attack on the Patriot Act is indistinguishable from an attack on the fourth amendment. Is this the most cogent, concise case they can put forward? Apparently so, leading me to believe they don't have a case.
Comments:
(Please keep in mind that each commenter's opinions are only his/her own.)
Post a Comment
<< Home